<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Future Shlock &#187; Singularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannybelkin.com/category/science-technology/singularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com</link>
	<description>Futurism, Technology, Parenthood, and whatever else is on my mind at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kurzweil and the Singularity &#8211; An Overview for the Uninitiated</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2011/02/ray-kurzweil-and-the-singularity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2011/02/ray-kurzweil-and-the-singularity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kurzweil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve seen a few of these in a variety of papers, this time it&#8217;s Time magazine&#8217;s turn to carry the life and times of Ray K and the singularity. Not much is new here to those who have been following the field, but it is a good read (especially for those who have not yet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2011/02/ray-kurzweil-and-the-singularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quoted in &#8220;Rough Guide to the Future&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2010/11/quoted-in-rough-guide-to-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2010/11/quoted-in-rough-guide-to-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rough guide to the future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was  asked a few months ago to answer three questions for the new &#8220;Rough Guide to the Future&#8221; which has just come out in print: Looking at the future of humanity (with no particular timeframe), what&#8217;s a. your highest hope; b. your best bet and c. your view as to what&#8217;s likely to happen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2010/11/quoted-in-rough-guide-to-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strong AI vs. Human-machine connection &#8211; which will come first (and why this is so important)?</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Existential Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve read my previous posts and the two singularity articles I&#8217;ve added to the site, you will know that in my opinion (and many others) there are two main avenues through which the singularity will emerge, when it does. The first, and most widely considered (both scientifically and in the public/media view), will follow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ironically enough &#8211; isn&#8217;t &#8220;the Singularity&#8221; sort of a religion itself?</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When considering all that is written about the singularity, in print and online (including by yours truly), it is useful to step back and consider things from a different, less involved, standpoint. What we have here is basically an idea. A belief. One which may be based on observed trends, but is nevertheless a projection [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of religion in a post-singularity, post-human world</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singluarity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few thoughts on post-human society, one which will emerge after the singularity (if we make it that far). First of all, a definition of Singularity for you laymen (and women) by one of those who coined the phrase, Vernor Vinge, taken from this interview: &#8220;My version is that in the near-historical future, it seems [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

