<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Future Shlock &#187; Science &amp; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannybelkin.com/category/science-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com</link>
	<description>Futurism, Technology, Parenthood, and whatever else is on my mind at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Strong AI vs. Human-machine connection &#8211; which will come first (and why this is so important)?</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Existential Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve read my previous posts and the two singularity articles I&#8217;ve added to the site, you will know that in my opinion (and many others) there are two main avenues through which the singularity will emerge, when it does. The first, and most widely considered (both scientifically and in the public/media view), will follow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/real-ai-vs-human-machine-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trends in pharma &#8211; connecting marketing and product development</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/further-trends-in-pharma-marketing-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/further-trends-in-pharma-marketing-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the major disconnects in the pharma industry, for a variety of reasons (historical, regulatory, organizational) is  the one between product development and the marketing which follows. Products have always been developed mostly tailored to functional specs, with the needs and convenience of patients who end up taking the medicines a secondary, or marginal, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/12/further-trends-in-pharma-marketing-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the $%!#happened to Wired?</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/what-the-happened-to-wired/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/what-the-happened-to-wired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last several long train/plane trips which I&#8217;ve taken over the past year or so I&#8217;ve bought and read the printed edition of Wired. Now, Wired is one of the best known geek-zines (leg-en-dary), and I&#8217;ve been reading it for over a decade. However, when I contrast my experience when reading it these days [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/what-the-happened-to-wired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ironically enough &#8211; isn&#8217;t &#8220;the Singularity&#8221; sort of a religion itself?</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When considering all that is written about the singularity, in print and online (including by yours truly), it is useful to step back and consider things from a different, less involved, standpoint. What we have here is basically an idea. A belief. One which may be based on observed trends, but is nevertheless a projection [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/10/ironically-enough-isnt-the-singularity-sort-of-a-religion-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of religion in a post-singularity, post-human world</title>
		<link>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singluarity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannybelkin.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few thoughts on post-human society, one which will emerge after the singularity (if we make it that far). First of all, a definition of Singularity for you laymen (and women) by one of those who coined the phrase, Vernor Vinge, taken from this interview: &#8220;My version is that in the near-historical future, it seems [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dannybelkin.com/2009/09/of-religion-in-a-post-singularity-post-human-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
